
LIBERTY-AIMS (NCT04684524) was a Phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled study investigating dupilumab, an interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 inhibitor, in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS). Following the findings from the LIBERTY-AIMS study, dupilumab was approved by the FDA in February 2026 for the treatment of adults and children (6 years and over) with AFRS.
In this Q&A, touchRESPIRATORY spoke with Dr Amber U. Luong (McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA) to explore the mechanism of action of dupilumab and the aims, methodology, and findings from the LIBERTY-AIMS study. Dr Luong also discusses the challenges associated with the treatment of AFRS, and the impact the recent FDA approval will have on the treatment paradigm.
The abstract “Dupilumab for Treatment of Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis in Adults and Children Aged 6 and Over: Results from the LIBERTY-AIMS Study” was presented at AAAAI 2026, Philadelphia, PA, USA; February 27–March 2, 2026.
touchRESPIRATORY coverage of AAAAI 2026: Standard-of-care treatments are surgery and long-term topical corticosteroids with courses of systemic corticosteroids commonly prescribed for recurrent symptoms and polyps. Systemic corticosteroids can pose safety risks when used long-term. Additionally, prior to dupilumab, no treatments were specifically indicated for AFRS. Dupilumab targets a shared receptor (IL-4Rα) for the IL-4 and IL-13 immune signalling molecules, or cytokines. Both of these are key drivers of type 2 inflammation, which is known to play an important role in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, a closely related disease to AFRS. Given this, there was a strong scientific rationale for investigating dupilumab in AFRS. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in adults and children aged 6 years and older with AFRS. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either dupilumab or placebo, and dupilumab was administered based on age and weight. The primary endpoint assessed change from baseline in sinus opacification, a way to measure the extent of tissue inflammation and mucus blocking the sinuses where there should be air flow. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline in patient-reported nasal congestion and change from baseline in nasal polyp score, a measure of nasal polyp size. Dupilumab significantly reduced sinus opacification, nasal polyp size, and nasal congestion/severity compared to placebo. Additionally, all patients on dupilumab achieved better thresholds of reduction for sinus opacification and nasal congestion at Week 52, and more patients on dupilumab had at least 1-point improvement on the scale measuring nasal polyp size at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 52, compared to placebo. The proportion of patients experiencing treatment emergent adverse events was similar across the two groups, but slightly lower for patients receiving dupilumab. Dupilumab provides AFRS patients an alternative treatment to revision sinus surgery or recurrent courses of oral steroids for recurrent nasal polyps. In addition, it inhibits two key drivers of type 2 inflammation, the biological process driving both the sinus inflammation and the intense allergic hypersensitivity to fungi that incite allergic rhinitis symptoms. Already registered? Login below.
Q. What challenges are associated with the treatment of AFRS in paediatric and adult patients?
Q. What is the mechanism of action of dupilumab and what was the rationale for investigating the IL-4/IL-13 inhibitor in AFRS?
Q. What were the aims, design and clinical endpoints of the LIBERTY-AIMS study?
Q. What were the key efficacy and safety findings from the Phase 3 study?
Q. Following the recent FDA approval, what impact will dupilumab have as the first and only therapy for AFRS?
Further content in rhinosinusitis.
Cite: Understanding dupilumab in AFRS: Phase 3 LIBERTY-AIMS trial findings behind FDA approval. touchRESPIRATORY. 19 March 2026.
Editor: Victoria Smith, Senior Content Editor.
Disclosures: Amber U. Luong discloses consulting for Stryker, Medtronic and Aerin Medical; receiving grant/research support from Sanofi and Eli Lily; and serving on advisory boards for GSK, Sanofi, Regeneran, AstraZeneca and Amgen.
This content has been developed independently by Touch Medical Media for touchRESPIRATORY in collaboration with Amber U. Luong. It is not affiliated with the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology (AAAAI). Views expressed are the speaker’s own and do not necessarily reflect the views of Touch Medical Media.
Related content
- ACAAI 2025: Key highlights in allergy, asthma, and immunology
- Allergic rhinitis in 2025: Expert strategies for optimizing treatment and clinical best practice
- EVEREST Trial Reveals Dupilumab’s Superiority Over Omalizumab in CRSwNP with Asthma
Register now to receive the touchRESPIRATORY newsletter!
Don’t miss out on hearing about our latest peer reviewed articles, expert opinions, conference news, podcasts and more.

